Wrong warnings for route=ferry relation

[nlehuby]

What steps will reproduce the problem?

1. load this route relation : ​http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2868848
2. validate
3. you get a warning about 'public_transport:version' tag missing, whereas the tag is present for this object

What is the expected result?

No warning about this missing tag

What happens instead?

A warning is raised

Please provide any additional information below. Attach a screenshot if possible.

URL:https://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk
Repository:UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b
Last:Changed Date: 2019-03-31 21:17:00 +0200 (Sun, 31 Mar 2019)
Build-Date:2019-03-31 20:25:18
Revision:14945
Relative:URL: ^/trunk

Identification: JOSM/1.5 (14945 fr) Linux Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS
Memory Usage: 794 MB / 1756 MB (209 MB allocated, but free)
Java version: 1.8.0_191-8u191-b12-2ubuntu0.16.04.1-b12, Oracle Corporation, OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM
Screen: :0.0 1366x768
Maximum Screen Size: 1366x768
Java package: openjdk-8-jre:amd64-8u191-b12-2ubuntu0.16.04.1
VM arguments: [-Djosm.restart=true, -Djava.net.useSystemProxies=true]
Dataset consistency test: No problems found

Plugins:
+ Mapillary (1.5.18)
+ OpeningHoursEditor (34867)
+ PicLayer (34867)
+ apache-commons (34506)
+ apache-http (34632)
+ conflation (0.6.2)
+ ejml (34389)
+ geojson (116)
+ geotools (34513)
+ jaxb (34678)
+ jna (34867)
+ jts (34524)
+ log4j (34527)
+ opendata (34911)
+ pbf (34867)
+ pt_assistant (2.1.10)
+ todo (30306)
+ utilsplugin2 (34932)

Tagging presets:
+ https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Presets/SITP-Transmilenio&zip=1
+ ${HOME}/github/zzz_josm_presets/police_FR.xml

Validator rules:
- https://github.com/Jungle-Bus/transport_mapcss/raw/gh-pages/transport.validator.zip

Last errors/warnings:
- W: No configuration settings found.  Using hardcoded default values for all pools.

[Don-vip]

(analysis previously made in #17662)

Strange bug. It goes back to r6810 where ferry route relation has been added as a "non-public transport" route relation, and yet r6863 checked it a few days later as a public transport route relation.

@Simon: what do you think?

[skyper]

See #18662 for problems with aerialway route relations.

[skyper]

Is covered by josm_17661_18662_route_relation_presets.patch​.

[Don-vip]

In 18204/josm:

fix #17661 - fix #18662 - add ptv1 and ptv2 route relations for ferry and aerialway (patch by skyper)

[Don-vip]

Milestone renamed