Opened 11 years ago
Closed 5 months ago
#9296 closed enhancement (fixed)
report missing (oneway:bicycle) for ways with (oneway=yes) and ((cycleway=opposite_lane) or (cycleway=opposite))
Reported by: | mkoniecz | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | Core validator | Version: | |
Keywords: | cycleway, opposite, oneway, bicycle | Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
Example of edit fixing this problem: osmwww:browse/changeset/18794423
This condition was tested in my personal validator (see https://github.com/Bulwersator/bicycle_map_of_Krakow/blob/0571ff154f5093c4fba25b62374e867bb738a98d/generate.rb#L65)
Repository Root: http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn Build-Date: 2013-11-09 02:35:12 Last Changed Author: Don-vip Revision: 6381 Repository UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b URL: http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk Last Changed Date: 2013-11-08 14:41:01 +0100 (Fri, 08 Nov 2013) Last Changed Rev: 6381 Identification: JOSM/1.5 (6381 en_GB) Windows 7 32-Bit Memory Usage: 247 MB / 247 MB (62 MB allocated, but free) Java version: 1.7.0_45, Oracle Corporation, Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM Dataset consistency test: No problems found Plugin: OpeningHoursEditor (29854) Plugin: notes (v0.6)
Attachments (0)
Change History (9)
comment:1 by , 11 years ago
comment:2 by , 11 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Keywords: | cycleway opposite oneway bicycle added |
comment:3 by , 11 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:4 by , 10 years ago
Another edit adding missing oneway:bicycle=no - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26218267
User who added contraflow tag was using JOSM - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47384265/history (edit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26029478 )
comment:5 by , 6 years ago
Keywords: | cycleway opposite oneway bicycle → cycleway, opposite, oneway, bicycle |
---|
comment:9 by , 5 months ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
As of r19212 JOSM will issue a warning and add oneway:bicycle=no
(if not present yet) for ways with cycleway=opposite*
, so I guess this is fixed?
Additional note: it should expect "oneway:bicycle" not just "oneway:bicycle=no" as there is possibility for degenerate situation where way is oneway in one direction and there is opposite/opposite_lane for bicycles - but way is oneway also for bicycle in opposite direction (AFAIK - this would be tagged with oneway:bicycle=-1). In my linked test I check only oneway:bicycle=no as I know that there is no example of something like this in my city.