#9261 closed enhancement (fixed)
detect ways with area=yes and nothing else
| Reported by: | mkoniecz | Owned by: | team |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 13.11 |
| Component: | Core validator | Version: | |
| Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
It is even worse than a completely untagged way.
Attachments (0)
Change History (11)
comment:1 by , 11 years ago
comment:2 by , 11 years ago
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/239044672
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/239044673
I recognise this user, it is yet another faulty edit from him, he is ignoring messages and I will delete this way. One of his previous edits was caught by validator on "way crossing other ways" test (it was cycleway duplicating existing ones, with weird tags and going through everything including buildings, roads etc).
So in this case: either beginner or troll (there were some very suspicious edits).
Anyway, it would be nice to have it easily detectable (I found this as I am filtering OSM data for my own purposes and I was checking output of things unrecognised by my filters).
follow-up: 7 comment:3 by , 11 years ago
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/223522885
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/223522884
Mistagged building (comment in one of changesets, building are visible in aerial view). I am retagging this way.
comment:4 by , 11 years ago
Mmm ok it's very easy to produce this with iD (1.3.1). Although there's a discrete warning before saving (iD informs me about "untagged area") the editor does not really forces user to fix them...)
comment:5 by , 11 years ago
And yet another:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/159525548
seems to be mistagged area, probably it was supposed to be some kind of landuse
comment:6 by , 11 years ago
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/237402595
Mistagged playground.
comment:7 by , 11 years ago
Replying to Bulwersator:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/223522885
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/223522884
Mistagged building (comment in one of changesets, building are visible in aerial view). I am retagging this way.
Please open a bug report against iD as the default for closed ways should be area=yes without tag and only for certain keys like highway=* you need to take the differences in account.
Upload of objects only tag with area=yes/no should not work and produce an error warning on all editors.
comment:8 by , 11 years ago
And yet another example of failed landuse: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/159657018
comment:10 by , 11 years ago
| Milestone: | → 13.11 (6383) |
|---|
Do you have an example ? I would like to know how/why people create such ways.