#6741 closed enhancement (fixed)
[Patch] Improve Advanced Object Info
Reported by: | simon04 | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | Core | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
I adapted the Advanced Object Info dialog to increase readability. The output is very similar to http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/.
Any comments?
Attachments (3)
Change History (14)
by , 13 years ago
Attachment: | 6741.patch added |
---|
by , 13 years ago
Attachment: | inspect.png added |
---|
comment:1 by , 13 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
follow-up: 4 comment:2 by , 13 years ago
comment:3 by , 13 years ago
So something like s="modified"; add(tr(s)); does not work.
It must be "s=marktr("modified"); add(tr(s));" :-)
follow-up: 5 comment:4 by , 13 years ago
Replying to bastiK:
- Why remove the sorting of the primitives?
I worked on this patch before your commit. I have no strong opinion on this point. When sticking to the order of selection (w/o sorting), it gives more control to the user.
I'll adapt the patch to reflect your suggestions. Better committing after the stabilization phase?
comment:5 by , 13 years ago
Replying to simon04:
Replying to bastiK:
- Why remove the sorting of the primitives?
I worked on this patch before your commit. I have no strong opinion on this point. When sticking to the order of selection (w/o sorting), it gives more control to the user.
The selection comes from a HashSet, so order is randomized.
Better committing after the stabilization phase?
Yes, unless you feel strongly about getting it into next tested.
by , 13 years ago
Attachment: | 6741.v2.patch added |
---|
comment:6 by , 13 years ago
I integrated your comments from above … I assume that I can commit this patch after the stabilization phase.
comment:7 by , 13 years ago
Sure, go ahead.
Maybe we can improve display of conflicts?
Node: 739410997 State: modified Data Set: 2c390c Edited at: 2011-09-06T10:15:06Z Edited by: alv (4660) Version: 3 In changeset: 9225884 Tags: "capacity"="9" "description"="pyöräteline" "amenity"="bicycle_parking" Coordinates: 60.2195182, 25.0042714 Coordinates (projected): 2783462.7599048135, 8448774.202314496 In conflict with: Node: 739410997 State: modified Data Set: 1f3b536 Edited at: 2011-09-06T10:15:06Z Edited by: alv (4660) Version: 3 In changeset: 9225884 Tags: "capacity"="8" "description"="pyöräteline" "amenity"="bicycle_parking" Coordinates: 60.21942278701698, 25.00446350188961 Coordinates (projected): 2783484.1445893454, 8448752.817629961
follow-up: 9 comment:8 by , 13 years ago
Replying to bastiK:
Maybe we can improve display of conflicts?
Of course, what do you suggest? Probably In conflict with Node: 739410997
(cf. your example)?
comment:9 by , 13 years ago
comment:10 by , 13 years ago
Minor stuff:
- Would be nice, to display number of nodes / members, for ways and relations.
- For way nodes, you don't need the prefix
Node:
in each line. - Role should be in quotes.
Looks better, IMHO.
Minor things:
s="modified"; add(tr(s));
does not work.