Opened 15 years ago
Last modified 3 years ago
#4654 new enhancement
warning when deleting an object with remaining conflict
Reported by: | skyper | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | Core | Version: | latest |
Keywords: | conflict delete | Cc: | skyper, bastiK |
Description (last modified by )
This is not a bug itself but the way JOSM works right now is dangerous and it is quite frustrating solving conflicts.
I have a conflict of elements with a way. This leads to have a node without connection nor tag on the active layer.
I delete this node because its "lonely" and I get no information about the pending conflict.
Yes, I should not have edited while there exists any conflicts, but this can also happen while solving conflicts on nodes with a pending conflict of elements of a way.
I am not able to restore this object (way) as it was if I have delete an element and restoring the element itself can take quit some time if you have to undo 50 conflict solutions and later manually redo them because of #4608.
version 2057
Thanks a lot skyper
Attachments (0)
Change History (7)
comment:1 by , 15 years ago
follow-up: 4 comment:2 by , 15 years ago
Priority: | critical → blocker |
---|
As deleting objects with conflict on leads to inconsistant data -> exceptions, I think we have to do something against it.
A warning might not be enough.
comment:3 by , 15 years ago
Priority: | blocker → critical |
---|
comment:4 by , 13 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Description: | modified (diff) |
Replying to skyper:
As deleting objects with conflict on leads to inconsistant data -> exceptions, I think we have to do something against it.
I think this is one reason why it was impossible to merge two offline edited osm file with partly same objects (for example route relations but a single way might be enough).
@bastiK:
On way to get inconsistant data.
A warning might not be enough.
Still no warning.
follow-up: 6 comment:5 by , 6 years ago
Priority: | critical → minor |
---|---|
Type: | defect → enhancement |
Replying to skyper:
I am not able to restore this object (way) as it was …
You could download it from the server.
comment:6 by , 5 years ago
Priority: | minor → normal |
---|
Replying to Hb---:
Replying to skyper:
I am not able to restore this object (way) as it was …
You could download it from the server.
As far as I remember, I did merge several, offline edited, overlapping areas that time. But your are right that I could have tried to change the object in a different layer and merge it back.
Replying to skyper:
sorry, version 3057