Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
#3553 closed defect (fixed)
Error on join overlapped areas
Reported by: | Owned by: | Gubaer | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | Core | Version: | latest |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
Path: trunk
URL: http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk
Repository Root: http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn
Repository UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b
Revision: 2161
Node Kind: directory
Last Changed Author: xeen
Last Changed Rev: 2161
Last Changed Date: 2009-09-19 16:37:52 +0200 (Sat, 19 Sep 2009)
Memory Usage: 29 MB / 1016 MB (10 MB allocated, but free)
Java version: 1.6.0_16
Plugins: usertoolsutilspluginvalidatorwmsplugin
Plugin usertools Version: 17359
Plugin utilsplugin Version: 17550
Plugin validator Version: 17592
Plugin wmsplugin Version: 17561
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/openstreetmap/josm/data/osm/TigerUtils
at UtilsPlugin.JoinAreasAction.checkForTagConflicts(JoinAreasAction.java:267)
at UtilsPlugin.JoinAreasAction.joinAreas(JoinAreasAction.java:189)
at UtilsPlugin.JoinAreasAction.actionPerformed(JoinAreasAction.java:170)
at javax.swing.AbstractButton.fireActionPerformed(Unknown Source)
at javax.swing.AbstractButton$Handler.actionPerformed(Unknown Source)
at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.fireActionPerformed(Unknown Source)
at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.setPressed(Unknown Source)
at javax.swing.AbstractButton.doClick(Unknown Source)
at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicMenuItemUI.doClick(Unknown Source)
at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicMenuItemUI$Handler.mouseReleased(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.AWTEventMulticaster.mouseReleased(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.Component.processMouseEvent(Unknown Source)
at javax.swing.JComponent.processMouseEvent(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.Component.processEvent(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.Container.processEvent(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.retargetMouseEvent(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.processMouseEvent(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.Window.dispatchEventImpl(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForFilters(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForFilter(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(Unknown Source)
Attachments (0)
Change History (9)
comment:1 by , 15 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from | to
comment:2 by , 15 years ago
Ouch, I didn't see the importance of
if (TigerUtils.isTigerTag(e.getKey())) { String combined = TigerUtils.combineTags(e.getKey(), e.getValue()); newWay.put(e.getKey(), combined); ...
because I replaced the section with a new conflict resolution dialog. I didn't remove it deliberately and it should be added to the new versions of CombineWay and MergeNodes again. I'll see what I can do.
This is not related to defect reported above, is it? TigerUtils itself is still there.
comment:3 by , 15 years ago
It does not get compiled for latest an more as it is not referenced inside of JOSM.
comment:4 by , 15 years ago
A josm-custom
build includes it, though. Do you remove unreferenced code when building latest
? Why?
comment:5 by , 15 years ago
No, the make process is somewhat different to ant. It only compiles code which is referenced somewhere.
comment:6 by , 15 years ago
This is a problem because when you develop/compile plugins you do it agains a josm-custom
build created with build.xml
in the OSM SVN. The production release should closely match this.
comment:8 by , 15 years ago
You're right. On the other hand a slightly different build on a server increases the server security. And also it shows problems like this one :-)
comment:9 by , 15 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Karl, In r2070 you removed the whole access to TigerUtils from CombineWay and MergeNodes. Why?