Opened 3 years ago
Last modified 3 years ago
#21602 new enhancement
Role verification problem with route_marker as member of recreation route
Reported by: | Filip009 | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | Internal preset | Version: | |
Keywords: | recreation route member role route_marker | Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
Please add to Bicycle route preset a route_marker node.
In Slovakia we use it, and is not good when JOSM reports problems with this.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Slovakia/Cycle_routes#Route_markers_examples
You can check if in this node added to relation is used tag bicycle=yes, this is bigger problem.
Attachments (1)
Change History (6)
by , 3 years ago
Attachment: | role_verification_problem.jpg added |
---|
comment:1 by , 3 years ago
Component: | Core validator → Internal preset |
---|---|
Description: | modified (diff) |
Keywords: | recreation route member role route_marker added |
comment:2 by , 3 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Status: | new → needinfo |
comment:3 by , 3 years ago
We have discussed it in Slovak OSM community, but whole thread is in Slovak. We have discussed if these guideposts can be tagged as is shown on the picture. And we have make conclusion, that we will tag it like it is shown in the last picture from which I have edited the osm wiki page for slovak cycleroutes.
https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/lKcfMSR9YVM
I mostly use it without role, but when I add a role "guidepost" to it, it is saying me the same error.
comment:4 by , 3 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Status: | needinfo → new |
Yes, the warning combines roles, type of object and tags on the object. :)
Maybe, an external preset can be used to overwrite the rules but I have not tried this, yet.
I like to have this discussed on a wider audience and appropriate channel. I have no problem with the tagging of these objects but route relations and their members + roles is another story. Personally, I'd prefer a new role marker
for all recreation route relations with a proper proposal. One thing to keep in mind is the members count as relations with too many members get hard to handle and are a burden on performance.
comment:5 by , 3 years ago
Summary: | Role verification problem → Role verification problem with route_marker as member of recreation route |
---|
Despite validator producing this warning the code is in defaultpresets.
Well, documentation of
information=route_marker
andinformation=trail_blaze
is very little without own wiki pages for the tag.Has this usage been discussed somewhere?
Can we get it documented first?
Do you have an example and which role do you use? I do not think it is smart to add it without role.