#20422 closed defect (duplicate)
"Relations with same members (1)" false positive
Reported by: | mkoniecz | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | Core validator | Version: | |
Keywords: | template_report same member | Cc: |
Description
What steps will reproduce the problem?
- Have building where levels 2-6 are fully a parking
- create two multipolygons with the same outer
- run validator
What is the expected result?
No complaints
What happens instead?
"Relations with same members (1)" that will be raise forever
Please provide any additional information below. Attach a screenshot if possible.
Relative:URL: ^/trunk Repository:UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b Last:Changed Date: 2021-01-21 23:33:21 +0100 (Thu, 21 Jan 2021) Revision:17474 Build-Date:2021-01-22 02:30:49 URL:https://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk Identification: JOSM/1.5 (17474 en) Linux Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS Memory Usage: 403 MB / 3974 MB (241 MB allocated, but free) Java version: 11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04, Ubuntu, OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Look and Feel: javax.swing.plaf.metal.MetalLookAndFeel Screen: :0.0 1920×1080 (scaling 1.00×1.00) Maximum Screen Size: 1920×1080 Best cursor sizes: 16×16→16×16, 32×32→32×32 Desktop environment: LXQt Java package: openjdk-11-jre:amd64-11.0.9.1+1-0ubuntu1~20.04 Java ATK Wrapper package: libatk-wrapper-java:all-0.37.1-1 Environment variable LANG: en_US.UTF-8 libcommons-logging-java: libcommons-logging-java:all-1.2-2 fonts-noto: fonts-noto:- Dataset consistency test: No problems found Plugins: + reverter (35688)
Attachments (0)
Change History (3)
comment:1 by , 4 years ago
Keywords: | same member added |
---|---|
Resolution: | → duplicate |
Status: | new → closed |
comment:2 by , 4 years ago
Replying to mkoniecz:
What happens instead?
"Relations with same members (1)" that will be raise forever
For now, you can add the individual error to your ignore list in order to not face again.
comment:3 by , 4 years ago
For now, you can add the individual error to your ignore list in order to not face again.
I know, but I was thinking rather about any other mapper validating this area (I am not expecting to map in this place ever again)
Closed as duplicate of #20293.