Opened 5 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
#18247 closed defect (fixed)
highway=footway ending with highway=elevator should not be "Way end node near other highway" to construction=primary
Reported by: | mkoniecz | Owned by: | Don-vip |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | 19.10 |
Component: | Core validator | Version: | |
Keywords: | template_report highway elevator | Cc: |
Description
What steps will reproduce the problem?
- download area around https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3774209825
- run validator
What is the expected result?
No spurious validator warnings
What happens instead?
"Way end node near other highway"
Please provide any additional information below. Attach a screenshot if possible.
Maybe exclude highway=elevator endings like noexit=yes?
sidewalk=separate
may be also used as hint that footways should not be joined to this carriageway (except crossings)
URL:https://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk Repository:UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b Last:Changed Date: 2019-10-08 23:08:20 +0200 (Tue, 08 Oct 2019) Build-Date:2019-10-08 21:10:57 Revision:15445 Relative:URL: ^/trunk Identification: JOSM/1.5 (15445 en) Linux Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS Memory Usage: 527 MB / 869 MB (205 MB allocated, but free) Java version: 1.8.0_201-b09, Oracle Corporation, Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM Screen: :0.0 1920x1080 Maximum Screen Size: 1920x1080 libcommons-logging-java: libcommons-logging-java:all-1.2-1+build1 fonts-noto: fonts-noto:- Dataset consistency test: No problems found Plugins: + OpeningHoursEditor (34977) + PicLayer (35104) + apache-commons (35092) + buildings_tools (35171) + continuosDownload (82) + ejml (35122) + geotools (35169) + imagery_offset_db (34908) + jts (35122) + log4j (34908) + measurement (35051) + reverter (35084) + todo (30306) Validator rules: + ${HOME}/Documents/install_moje/OSM software/josm/data/validator/deprecated.mapcss + ${HOME}/Documents/install_moje/OSM software/josm/data/validator/unnecessary.mapcss + ${HOME}/Documents/install_moje/OSM software/josm/data/validator/combinations.mapcss Last errors/warnings: - W: No configuration settings found. Using hardcoded default values for all pools. - W: Failed to add ${HOME}/Documents/install_moje/OSM software/josm/data/validator/deprecated.mapcss to tag checker - W: java.nio.file.NoSuchFileException: ${HOME}/Documents/install_moje/OSM software/josm/data/validator/deprecated.mapcss - W: Failed to add ${HOME}/Documents/install_moje/OSM software/josm/data/validator/unnecessary.mapcss to tag checker - W: java.nio.file.NoSuchFileException: ${HOME}/Documents/install_moje/OSM software/josm/data/validator/unnecessary.mapcss - W: Failed to add ${HOME}/Documents/install_moje/OSM software/josm/data/validator/combinations.mapcss to tag checker - W: java.nio.file.NoSuchFileException: ${HOME}/Documents/install_moje/OSM software/josm/data/validator/combinations.mapcss - W: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
Attachments (0)
Change History (8)
comment:1 by , 5 years ago
Keywords: | highway elevator added |
---|---|
Milestone: | → 19.10 |
Owner: | changed from | to
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:2 by , 5 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
comment:3 by , 5 years ago
Priority: | normal → minor |
---|
comment:4 by , 5 years ago
Same goes for "public_transport=platform" when connected to a "highway=path"? cv. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/211762485
comment:5 by , 5 years ago
In this case there was missing highway=footway
tag on this way. I added it.
comment:6 by , 5 years ago
I have seen - problem still remains though - between platform and rails, so it seems to me.
Then there is another problem of the same kind with "highway=bus_stop" - e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/401859666 - the tagging conforms to the wiki instructions, doesn't it?
comment:7 by , 5 years ago
Resolution: | fixed |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
The test in the code should also ignore nodes AND ways tagged "public_transport=platform" - they always "end near other …"
comment:8 by , 5 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | reopened → closed |
Please don't reopen closed tickets of a past milestone but open a new one instead. Attaching a sample .osm file of a real-world example is also useful.
In 15468/josm: