Cleanup tourism keys

[anonymous]

Remove
tourism=apartments (old tag, see wiki) and
tourism=wine_cellar (possibly amenity [see the talk page] and used only 504 times wordwide)

[anonymous]

*worldwide sorry

[Klumbumbus]

What do you mean with "cleanup" and "remove". These tags are not in the internal presets.

[anonymous]

You can see those two keys in the tourism dropdown list. In my opinion they shouldn't be there.

[Klumbumbus]

Please add your statusreport (see newticket).

[anonymous]

URL:https://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk
Repository:UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b
Last:Changed Date: 2019-06-18 23:40:26 +0200 (Tue, 18 Jun 2019)
Build-Date:2019-06-19 01:30:55
Revision:15185
Relative:URL: ^/trunk

Identification: JOSM/1.5 (15185 en_GB) Windows 10 64-Bit
OS Build number: Windows 10 Pro 1809 (17763)
Memory Usage: 738 MB / 1820 MB (210 MB allocated, but free)
Java version: 1.8.0_211-b12, Oracle Corporation, Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM
Screen: \Display0 1920x1200
Maximum Screen Size: 1920x1200
VM arguments: [-Djava.security.manager, -Djava.security.policy=file:<java.home>\lib\security\javaws.policy, -DtrustProxy=true, -Djnlpx.home=<java.home>\bin, -Djnlpx.origFilenameArg=%UserProfile%\AppData\LocalLow\Sun\Java\Deployment\cache\6.0\31\583aa85f-6f9da138, -Djnlpx.remove=false, -Djava.util.Arrays.useLegacyMergeSort=true, -Djnlpx.heapsize=NULL,2048m, -Djnlpx.splashport=56766, -Djnlp.application.href=https://josm.openstreetmap.de/download/josm-latest.jnlp, -Djnlpx.jvm=<java.home>\bin\javaw.exe]
Dataset consistency test: No problems found

Plugins:
+ FixAddresses (34977)
+ OpeningHoursEditor (34977)
+ apache-commons (34908)
+ buildings_tools (34982)
+ continuosDownload (82)
+ ejml (34908)
+ geojson (124)
+ geotools (34908)
+ jaxb (35014)
+ jts (34908)
+ opendata (34997)
+ reverter (34999)
+ tag2link (34977)
+ tageditor (34977)
+ turnlanes-tagging (281)
+ utilsplugin2 (34977)
+ wikipedia (v1.1.1)

Map paint styles:
+ https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/Maxspeed&zip=1
- https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/Lane_and_Road_Attributes&zip=1
- https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/PublicTransport&zip=1

Validator rules:
+ https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Rules/OsmoseValidations&zip=1

[Klumbumbus]

(fix ticket edit conflict)

[Klumbumbus]

As you don't have any other presets installed there is one of these two reasons that you see it in the list.

• the tags are used somewhere in your downloaded area
• you added the tags before during your josm session

Thats the default behavior of JOSM.
I don't think we need deprecation warnings, as for apartments there is already the "value unknown maybe apartment is meant" warning and wine_cellar is not really deprecated in the wiki.

[anonymous]

If I download data from the middle of the oceans (actually nothing will be downloaded) those 2 values still remain here. Of course, I restarted JOSM several times.
So for me looks like a caching bug :/

[Klumbumbus]

They are still in the drop down list as long as they are still in the list of last used tags in the add value dialog (the list when you close the drop down menu in your screenshot).

[anonymous]

Okay, so the things I tried:

• restarting JOSM
• restarting the computer
• deleting Java cache

and then after downloading data from the Atlantic Ocean, JOSM still come up with tourism=apartments and tourism=wine_cellar.

Replying to Klumbumbus:

They are still in the drop down list as long as they are still in the list of last used tags in the add value dialog (the list when you close the drop down menu in your screenshot).

These tags are not in the tag's history, at least I can't see them.

[anonymous]

You are right, I just deleted the properties.recent-tags keys and they are finally gone.

I don't remember if typed myself these values. Are they get into this list if the object tags copied and pasted to another?

[Klumbumbus]

Replying to anonym:

Are they get into this list if the object tags copied and pasted to another?

No but when editing them (even if you didn't change them when editing).

[anonymous]

It's a total mystery.

[anonymous]

Wait, the user added values doesn't need to appear at the bottom of the dropdown list? Because sometimes I see them there, but not in this case.