Opened 16 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
#1747 closed defect (fixed)
[regression] When a relation has no name and ref show note text
Reported by: | Owned by: | framm | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | Core | Version: | latest |
Keywords: | Cc: | Ldp |
Description
When there is a number of relations having no name and ref fields it's useful to use the "note" field to show what relation is what.
Untested (even uncompiled) patch attached.
Attachments (1)
Change History (5)
by , 16 years ago
Attachment: | josm_note.patch added |
---|
comment:1 by , 16 years ago
Summary: | When a relation has no name and ref show note text → [PATCH] When a relation has no name and ref show note text |
---|
comment:2 by , 16 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:3 by , 15 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Priority: | minor → normal |
Resolution: | fixed |
Status: | closed → reopened |
Summary: | [PATCH] When a relation has no name and ref show note text → [regression] When a relation has no name and ref show note text |
Type: | enhancement → defect |
Version: | → latest |
There is a regression on this ticket when going from JOSM 1986 to 1992. Probably in 1990.
JOSM 1992 shows "relation <id>" in the selection and relation list, when the relation has no name. It should fall back to note (or ref) in this case, instead of the generic "relation <id>".
patch