#14779 closed enhancement (fixed)
Review warning message for highway=road
Reported by: | naoliv | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 17.06 |
Component: | Core validator | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
After validating a highway=road
way we can see a warning message saying temporary highway type
, but it seems that by using temporary doesn't pass the full meaning of road in OSM (ie, the user doesn't understand that this is an unknown highway and that it's classification should be clarified).
Is it possible to formulate another message that indicates that highway=road
should be properly classified/identified? (when and if possible, of course)
URL:http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk Repository:UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b Last:Changed Date: 2017-05-11 01:53:27 +0200 (Thu, 11 May 2017) Build-Date:2017-05-11 01:33:12 Revision:12116 Relative:URL: ^/trunk Identification: JOSM/1.5 (12116 en) Linux Debian GNU/Linux 9.0 (stretch) Memory Usage: 247 MB / 10206 MB (114 MB allocated, but free) Java version: 1.8.0_131-8u131-b11-1-b11, Oracle Corporation, OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Screen: :0.0 1600x900, :0.1 1280x1024 Maximum Screen Size: 1600x1024 Java package: openjdk-8-jre:amd64-8u131-b11-1 Java ATK Wrapper package: libatk-wrapper-java:all-0.33.3-13 VM arguments: [-Dawt.useSystemAAFontSettings=on, -Dawt.useSystemAAFontSettings=on] Program arguments: [--language=en] Dataset consistency test: No problems found
Attachments (0)
Change History (6)
comment:1 by , 8 years ago
comment:2 by , 8 years ago
Is unspecified
better than temporary
?
Not stated clearly or exactly
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/unspecified
comment:5 by , 8 years ago
changed temporary to unspecific. "local check" is not always neccessary e.g. for highway=service service=driveway
comment:6 by , 8 years ago
Milestone: | → 17.06 |
---|
Do you have an idea about the formulating?