Opened 16 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
#1460 closed defect (fixed)
JOSM #869 crashes on my Installation. reverting to #802 works well!
Reported by: | Owned by: | framm | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | |
Component: | Core | Version: | latest |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
JOSM #869 crashes on my Installation. reverting to #802 works well!
even newer versions as #802 worked (I already had a version with the virtual nodes)
but I can't remember the buildnumber.
Any suggestions?
best regards
Path: trunk
URL: http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk
Repository Root: http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn
Repository UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b
Revision: 869
Node Kind: directory
Last Changed Author: stoecker
Last Changed Rev: 869
Last Changed Date: 2008-08-25 21:14:43 +0200 (Mon, 25 Aug 2008)
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.tagging.TaggingPreset.setDisplayName(TaggingPreset.java:344)
at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.tagging.TaggingPreset.readAll(TaggingPreset.java:430)
at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.tagging.TaggingPreset.readFromPreferences(TaggingPreset.java:463)
at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.preferences.TaggingPresetPreference.initialize(TaggingPresetPreference.java:125)
at org.openstreetmap.josm.Main.<init>(Main.java:195)
at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.MainApplication.<init>(MainApplication.java:35)
at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.MainApplication.main(MainApplication.java:154)
Attachments (0)
Change History (4)
comment:1 by , 16 years ago
comment:2 by , 16 years ago
Use r869 for renision :-)
Do you use an own presets file? Please attach it.
comment:3 by , 16 years ago
yep!
taggingpreset.sources= http://christeck.de/stuff/presets.xml
It still crashes in r874. I removed this line in preferences and not it starts.
Should it really be possible that an XML can crash JOSM?
comment:4 by , 16 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Fixed in r875.
Sure is it possible, that an XML crash JOSM. Outside data is usually the reason a program crashs.
BTW: Why do you use that preset file? It is outdated compared to the internal one and does not contain additional stuff.
With #869 i talked about the revision, not the bug number. ;-)