#12942 closed defect (fixed)
Allow oneway=yes in route relations
Reported by: | Hufkratzer | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 16.06 |
Component: | Core validator | Version: | tested |
Keywords: | validator route oneway | Cc: | Hufkratzer |
Description
What steps will reproduce the problem?
- Load a route relation wirh "oneway=yes", e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1158932 hiking
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4007549 hiking
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4007549 hiking
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2910040 hiking (from closed https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/9992)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1625564 foot
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/179634 running
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4052912 horse
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6010915 piste
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/414663 piste
- Execute the validator
What is the expected result?
The validator should allow oneway=yes in route relations without complaint
What happens instead?
The validaor gives a warning: "oneway without highway or railway"
Please provide any additional information below. Attach a screenshot if possible.
Page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking#Tags_of_the_relation says:
"optional) Use oneway=yes to indicate that the route is to be walked in only one direction, according to the signposts on the ground"
Page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway says: "use on relations unspecified".
Corresponding discussion in repository of waymarkedtrails.org:
https://github.com/lonvia/waymarked-trails-site/issues/202
I see no need for a warning here, it's rather confusing; what else should one use in such cases?
Compare https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/9992 (closed)
URL:http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk Repository:UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b Last:Changed Date: 2016-04-28 12:48:16 +0200 (Thu, 28 Apr 2016) Build-Date:2016-04-28 10:51:36 Revision:10161 Relative:URL: ^/trunk Identification: JOSM/1.5 (10161 en) Windows XP 32-Bit Memory Usage: 162 MB / 989 MB (43 MB allocated, but free) Java version: 1.7.0_80-b15, Oracle Corporation, Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM Dataset consistency test: No problems found Plugins: - PicLayer (32158) - apache-commons (32158) - routes (32158) - scripting (30722) Tagging presets: - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Presets/NewTags&zip=1 Map paint styles: - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/MTB&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/Surface&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/Surface-DataEntry&zip=1
Attachments (0)
Change History (2)
comment:1 by , 8 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:2 by , 8 years ago
Milestone: | → 16.06 |
---|
In 10350/josm: