Opened 9 years ago
Last modified 6 years ago
#11902 new enhancement
Geotagging, then using jhead results in message 'Suspicious offset of first Exif IFD value'
Reported by: | skorbut | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | Plugin photo_geotagging | Version: | latest |
Keywords: | template_report | Cc: |
Description
What steps will reproduce the problem?
- Geotag a JPEG image using a GPX track
- Adjust the timestamp of the image using "jhead -ta"
What is the expected result?
jhead will adjust the timestamp without indication of an error.
What happens instead?
jhead reports:
Nonfatal Error : 'thefile.jpg' Suspicious offset of first Exif IFD value
Modified: thefile.jpg
I'm not sure if this is an indication of a problem of any kind but it's certainly not reassuring having to see this message.
Please provide any additional information below. Attach a screenshot if possible.
JOSM Revision: 8800
Jhead version: 2.97 Compiled: Apr 28 2013
Attachments (2)
Change History (8)
comment:1 by , 9 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Status: | new → needinfo |
by , 9 years ago
Attachment: | fakeGPStrack.gpx added |
---|
by , 9 years ago
Attachment: | IMG_7250_small.JPG added |
---|
comment:2 by , 9 years ago
I uploaded a new picture and a suitable (faked) GPX track (timezone may need adjustment to match).
The originally linked file exif-example_direction.jpg seems a bit suspicious: When I open it and try to auto-guess the time-offset, JOSM reports:
The selected photos do not contain time information.
However, jhead (with only the filename as argument) reports
Date/Time : 2010:05:15 17:12:05
from which I conclude that the time information is available.
comment:3 by , 9 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Status: | needinfo → new |
comment:6 by , 6 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|
I cannot reproduce using source:trunk/data_nodist/exif-example_direction.jpg. Please provide an example image