Opened 10 years ago
Last modified 5 years ago
#11446 new enhancement
Download around node
Reported by: | naoliv | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | Core | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: | sebastic |
Description
When a node is selected, Download along
is disabled (we can't run it).
Instead this, couldn't we have an option to Download around
the node?
It could use a radius
input as option.
JOSM:
Build-Date: 2015-05-16 16:26:50 Revision: 8366 Is-Local-Build: true Identification: JOSM/1.5 (8366 SVN pt_BR) Linux Debian GNU/Linux unstable (sid) Memory Usage: 247 MB / 4029 MB (134 MB allocated, but free) Java version: 1.7.0_79, Oracle Corporation, OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Java package: openjdk-7-jre:amd64-7u79-2.5.5-1 VM arguments: [-Dawt.useSystemAAFontSettings=on] Dataset consistency test: No problems found Plugins: - AddrInterpolation (30892) - Create_grid_of_ways (30892) - FastDraw (30892) - FixAddresses (30892) - OpeningHoursEditor (30962) - PicLayer (31114) - SimplifyArea (30962) - buildings_tools (31120) - download_along (30892) - editgpx (30892) - geotools (31068) - graphview (30892) - jts (31002) - measurement (30892) - merge-overlap (30988) - opendata (31116) - pdfimport (30892) - poly (31056) - reverter (31120) - tagging-preset-tester (31120) - todo (29154) - turnrestrictions (31034) - undelete (30892) - utilsplugin2 (31120)
Attachments (0)
Change History (6)
comment:1 by , 6 years ago
comment:2 by , 6 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:3 by , 6 years ago
Component: | Plugin download_along → Core |
---|---|
Summary: | "Download around" option → Download around node |
follow-up: 5 comment:4 by , 5 years ago
My workflow is to zoom on the selected node "Zoom to selection" followed by "Download in current view".
Isn't that good enough?
comment:5 by , 5 years ago
Replying to GerdP:
My workflow is to zoom on the selected node "Zoom to selection" followed by "Download in current view".
Isn't that good enough?
Not when you have many nodes covering a large area.
Ticket #17776 has been marked as a duplicate of this ticket.