Opened 11 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
#10102 closed defect (fixed)
undelete falsely reports redacted object
Reported by: | malenki | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | |
Component: | Plugin undelete | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
When trying to undelete way 24562557 JOSM gives the message that the way cannot be undeleted; the object most likely got redacted.
This is only partly true: the first eight versions of the way are hidden because of redaction, but the following seven are not: https://www.osm.org/way/24562557
Attachments (0)
Change History (4)
comment:1 by , 11 years ago
comment:2 by , 9 years ago
Just had the same thing happen to me as well. Versions 1, 6, 7, 8 are all safe (including v9 since it was the 'deleted' one) for Node 113983539, thus, the node should have been able to be undeleted without any problems since the redacted versions of it are well in the past. Also led me to 2, yes, 2 NPE's. 1 in the mapmode.DrawAction (#11759), and 1 in the utilsplugin2 plugin's 'replacegeometry' (#11760).
comment:3 by , 9 years ago
Priority: | normal → major |
---|
Still Undelete skips undeleting objects when there is a redaction somewhere in their history. Here a list of affected nodes I had to undelete (for the time being locally) in an other way:
n144085104,n185508211,n240026338,n240041761,n240047023,n240053930,n240069675,n240069947,n240101996, n240108925,n240118706,n245952092,n256612387,n256673909,n259400775,n265753547,n266024248,n268112764, n268746106,n268787779,n268814187,n268814639,n269433208,n269593258,n276991268,n277624615,n279199996, n293706868,n293706869,n299517876,n302444060,n309598468,n310013149,n315777229,n331236653,n332576433, n351921854,n351921858,n351933134,n351938388,n360063296,n36170855,n364455363,n390716154,n393080829, n393091050,n393091149,n393091809,n393313350,n394628365,n394632165,n409690051,n412748103,n421833671, n427589507,n437891823,n437891824,n437891829,n449189546,n459757600,n462312302,n463470837,n512653106, n513104146,n513104149,n513104152,n513104153,n513482963,n513497695,n513497744,n534156518,n546828634, n546828644,n55387788,n559624534,n60457245,n60844689,n60885492,n689883525,n769051077,n82679372, n82679374,n83076206,n937042688,n945981889
Stumbled again over this issue with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/513104153