Changes between Version 41 and Version 42 of Styles/Coloured_Streets


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2014-04-14T19:02:49+02:00 (11 years ago)
Author:
Klumbumbus
Comment:

wikitext update to version 3.10.xx and small fixes

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Styles/Coloured_Streets

    v41 v42  
    2121[http://gulp21.bplaced.net/osm/housenumbervalidator/ HousenumberValidator],
    2222[http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/debug.html?view=addresses OSM Inspector],
    23 [http://www.itoworld.com/map/9# ITO maps],
    24 [osmwiki:Roof_modelling Roof modelling].
     23[http://www.itoworld.com/map/9# ITO maps].
    2524
    2625For the Coloured Streets mappaint style JOSM version 9609 or newer is required. For '''ideas/questions/bugs/suggestions''' or similar please write a message to [osmwww:user/geozeisig geozeisig] and/or [osmwww:user/Klumbumbus Klumbumbus].
    … …  
    3231[[Image(exampleColouredStreets.png)]]
    3332
    34 ^(data used for image [osmwww:copyright ©OpenStreetMap contributors])^
     33^(data used for image [osmwww:copyright ©OpenStreetMap contributors] ODbL)^
     34
     35Coloured Streets at low zoom level:
     36
     37[[Image(exampleColouredStreetsLowZoom.png)]]
     38
     39^(data used for image [osmwww:copyright ©OpenStreetMap contributors] ODbL)^
    3540
    3641For comparison, here is a part of my "test center".
    … …  
    4348
    4449=== Changelog ===
     50^(Latest change first)^
     51==== Version 3.01.xx to 3.10.xx ====
     52* When you zoom out the nodes get smaller until they finally disappear
     53* Text and icons are hidden on low zoom levels
     54* The text gets a bit bigger at high zoom levels
     55This all results in better readability on higher zoom levels and a better overview on lower zoom levels. This was inspired by the style [LessObtrusiveNodes Less Obtrusive Nodes]. So you no longer need to activate both, but just Colured Streets and you get a nice view on all zoom levels.
    4556==== Version 3.0.xx to 3.01.xx ====
    4657* The warning massage on streets "no name!" changed to "name?". All messages do now follow the same schema (all messages where something is missing with "?" and all messages where something is wrong with "!").