Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #9819, comment 22


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2021-05-21T01:28:34+02:00 (3 years ago)
Author:
skyper

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #9819, comment 22

    v1 v2  
    77So far there is the discussion if:
    88* this test should do what is requested for in the ticket description: Only checking highway crossing waterway (only possible in java code)
    9 * high-/rail-/waterway with ´layer´ but no `bridge` or `tunnel` (probably few more keys) should be warned about, in general.
     9* high-/rail-/waterway with `layer` but no `bridge` or `tunnel` (probably few more keys) should be warned about, in general.
    1010
    1111In the second case, the warning should not demand to add tunnel or bridge but to inspect the situation as e.g. removing `layer` might be the correct solution.