Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #8612
- Timestamp:
- 2013-04-16T10:58:09+02:00 (12 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #8612
- Property Cc added
-
Ticket #8612 – Description
v1 v2 7 7 1. Allow "noconfirm" option to `add_tags` parameter - do not show confirmation dialog at all (+one more security permission ? ) 8 8 9 2. Allow separate request to return JOSM version (to check supporting extra fuctionality). Do we want to allow getting some more JOSM info, like installed plugins ? 9 2. Allow separate request to return JOSM version (to check supporting extra functionality). Do we want to allow getting some more JOSM info, like installed plugins ? 10 10 11 11 3. Allow to add changeset tags that indicate using the specific validator/web tool by remote request (`changeset_tags` parameter?) , related to #8149 … … 13 13 -- From me: 14 14 15 4. Document, en chance and use `zoom_mode` parameter in all possible commands (see also #5669)15 4. Document, enhance and use `zoom_mode` parameter in all possible commands (see also #5669) 16 16 17 5. (most crazy) Support opening remote file with preferences http://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Preferences/ImportExport or execute configuration xml script sent in POST request if the user really agree with it. This could help to install plugins, specify imagery sources customize toolbars/styles/presets for team work. 17 5. Add usage example to the reply on errors and empty parameter lists, #8228 18 19 6. (most crazy) Support opening remote file with preferences http://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Preferences/ImportExport or execute configuration xml script sent in POST request if the user really agree with it. This could help to install plugins, specify imagery sources customize toolbars/styles/presets for team work. 18 20 But there is possible security issue - for now, arbitrary JS execution is allowed and JS has full access to Java API. The code checker may be added to restrict the configuration, maybe forbid JS execution more complex than `${a==2 && b==3}`. 19 21