Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #22634, comment 1


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2023-01-09T19:30:31+01:00 (2 years ago)
Author:
skyper

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #22634, comment 1

    initial v1  
    1 I wonder if it is possible to properly sort members without knowing the type of the relation. I have added an [attachment:      relation_sorting_benchmark_v2.osm updated example] with some relations which are proper sorted and sorting creates a mess with `type=route`. For multipolygons and boundaries it might make sense to have as many closed rings as possible.
     1I wonder if it is possible to properly sort members without knowing the type of the relation. I have added an updated example ([attachment:     relation_sorting_benchmark_v2.osm]) with some relations which are proper sorted and sorting creates a mess with `type=route`. For multipolygons and boundaries it might make sense to have as many closed rings as possible.
    22Probably, it is better to recheck with some real world examples.
    33