Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #18018, comment 13


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2020-04-05T14:51:12+02:00 (5 years ago)
Author:
skyper

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #18018, comment 13

    initial v1  
    11Replying to [comment:12 GerdP]:
    22> So you think the existence of a role=forward/backward means there is no need to look at other members?
    3 No, we need to look at the members to find out if it is a "oneway or "dual-way" situation. As long as there is no other way without `forward/backward´ sharing an end node in between the line/string of members with role `forward/backward´. I have added a version 3 of the example file which includes two dual-way relations C1/C2.
     3No, we need to look at the members to find out if it is a "oneway or "dual-way" situation. As long as there is no other way without `forward/backward` sharing an end node in between the line/string of members with role `forward/backward`. I have added a version 3 of the example file which includes two dual-way relations C1/C2.