Changes between Version 5 and Version 6 of Ticket #15637, comment 7
- Timestamp:
- 2017-12-06T14:32:20+01:00 (7 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #15637, comment 7
v5 v6 8 8 A correct statement would have been: It may be ''viewed'' as one object, depending on your perspective. We actually have a building, building levels, an address and a store that is being talked about here. Since the address is usually assigned to the building, it may even be possible that multiple stores use the same address. But this is not being discussed within the scope of this ticket. 9 9 10 The issue of the ticket seems valid however, since the recommendation you referenced from the osm wiki seems less challengeable for (at least the common types of) elevators. (Of course, an elevator is made up of multiple objects as well, but afaik this is currently not expressed by OSMs data features, so there is some atomicity about that. Even if we were to tag the elevator as area or volume we'd have exactly one feature in OSM representing the lift shaft. Building floors and rooms on different levels however are multiple features.) 10 The issue of the ticket seems valid however, since the recommendation you referenced from the osm wiki seems less challengeable for (at least the common types of) elevators. (Of course, an elevator is made up of multiple objects as well, but afaik this is currently not expressed by OSMs data features, so there is some atomicity about that. Even if we were to tag the elevator as area or volume we'd have exactly one feature in OSM representing the lift shaft. Building floors and rooms on different levels however are multiple features if the indoor mapping proposal is taken into account.)
