Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of Ticket #15637, comment 5


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2017-12-06T14:04:29+01:00 (7 years ago)
Author:
cmuelle8

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #15637, comment 5

    v2 v3  
    1010But for the store level abstraction above this does not seem to apply.  These are three distinct building levels and
    1111using the indoor mapping proposal they will be represented by one object each.  So shouldn't the node that seems like
    12 a predeccesor to that in this case also exist in a distint way for each level?
     12a predeccesor to that in this case also exist distinctly for each level?
    1313
    1414If the three building levels ''were'' already indoor-mapped, the store would probably be expressed as a relation